Dangerous Idea, Part 2

Hello from 4th and Vine in downtown Cincinnati. I’m in need of extra caffiene to get through part 2 of my reflections on the “Creation Museum” in Petersburg, KY (a project of Answers in Genesis). Yes, I did lose some sleep over this one. I recall saying that I was going to try and have a balanced approach to this issue of creation pseudo-science. And by balance I meant an attempt to be open and sympathtic to the holders of these views. As there is no controversy or scientific clash over any of the core issues of either evolution or the basic mechanics of the scientific method, there is nothing to “balance.” Creation science, and it’s driving dogma of Intelligent Design, are religious and, yet again,  political “creations” that are gathering thunderclouds on an approaching horizon. After my encounters yesterday, I now found it very difficult to be generous of intent.

Thirty years ago, as an aspiring philosopher working his way through the gems of Scholastic Theology, I accepted the Argument from Design as an interesting but ultimately flawed methodology for proving the existence of an all powerful god. Scholasticism and the urgent struggle with dancing angels on the tips of pins gave way to Francis Bacon and the beginnings of real empiricism and scientific method. No more metaphysical relativism. Facts and facts and more facts, forcing us forward to define clear statements of verifiable reality, in a language that trancended individual biases and preoccupations. And yes, Charles Darwin was an accomplished practioner of this method. His works remain, even with the missing tools of genetics, massive taxonomical databases, and plate techtonics, an intellectual and rational response to all of creation psuedo-scientism. He wins this debate before it even starts so I’ll leave the particulars to others (see links and citations below for some great readings to provide to your local school board and science teachers).

You see, the Creation Museum isn’t about science, or truth, or even the origin of life. It’s a neatly wrapped box, with ribbons on tunnels and baubles of “interactive” experiences, targeted at the ancient segments of the human brain. It’s about branding a frighten emotional response into the minds of true believers in order to separate them from the godless world and the vast majority of decent people who live in it. Think Waco or Jim Jones with lots of money and political leverage. This world of ours is in decay and hellbent on hell. All pain is the result of the orginal fall from grace combined with our refusal to accept the unwavering word of god. When judgement comes, in the very near future, those “left behind” will not just be bereft of god’s countenance. They will suffer unspeakable pains at the hands of the “final Adams” who will mete out god’s judgement.

There is little if any real evidence on display. 90% of the exhibits are carefully crafted video feeds, spewing forth simultaneously from multiple screens, claustrophobic hallways of rapid news reel and TV news feeds or second rate dioramas of prehistoric and biblical scenes. The “tunnel of time,” an arch walkway of perhaps 20 feet, is a laughable black tunnel wth lots of last year’s twinkly holiday lights suggesting the perfection of the celestial firmament. The anomatronic dinosaur, spotted shortly before the fall of man due to Eve’s seduction by the serpent, is simplistic by current science museum standards.

The museum patron has little if any control over the exhibits or the flow of the experience. Images of all things Nazi Germany are a special favorite of the video walls, flashing a sense of fear and doom into the passive limbic system. All good displays channel viewers through the sometimes complicated presentations. The better exhibits, like the previously mention Illinois State Museum “Changes” exhibit in Springfield, offer multiple options and plenty of light and air. This museum funnels viewers through dark and shrinking warrens with all exit doors closed or blocked by smiling creationist docents attired in faux field fossil dig fashions. No deviation from the proper path is encouraged and one older visitor had to be helped out of the exhibits by “security” staff after she became disoriented trying to find an exit to a bathroom.

Let me not forget the “security” or Creation Museum Protection Services officers. When I pulled through the gates of the Museum estate I was greeted by a large Kentucky State Police Trooper in full gear, K-9 dogs included. At least, he really looked like a State Trooper in two-tone beige/brown uniform, round brim “smokey bear” hat and utility belt. At closer inspection (like right up close so I could see the Answers in Creation corporate logo on his shoulder), he was just one of a number of Protection Officers prepared to protect the Museum from…what? When was the last time you went to a public museum that had guard dogs and fake State Troopers as parking attendants? This alone speaks volumes about the indoctrinal techniques of the Museum sponsors. Fake police, overkill security, frightening intimations of impending doom, mind numbing video displays (recall the training segments from the short-lived James Cameron TV sci fi series, Dark Angel?), and “Stepford Staff” of true blue tour guides. To top it off, they even had a special “Men in White” theatre segment to explain the real deal of how the universe works. I skipped this part of the exhibit. I recall there being some type of mind erasing tool wielded by Tommy Lee Jones in the “Black” movies and I wanted no part of the Creationism version.

Just as this Museum has nothing to do with science it also has nothing to do with the search for truth. The opening exhibit presents a video of two “colleagues” on a dig discussing how their different starting points explain their different interpretation of the facts of fossils and the massive geological record of physical upheaval and organic evolution. The hatless, t-shirt wearing NON-WHITE scientist explains in a halting voice that he “believes” these fossils are millions of years old because the theory of evolution tells him so. His older, WHITE, creationist associate, decked out in proper head gear, safari vest, and real scientist work boots explains how the Bible more clearly documents the entombment of these poor creatures in the GREAT FLOOD that was god’s justifed response to the wickedness of man. Is not the pot calling the cultural kettle black? I’m certain that this “same facts, different starting point” is as close to a simple definition of relativism as you can get. Shame on those creation scientists for waffling on the absolute nature of truth.

And, finally, speaking further of the relative nature of truth…INCEST! The exhibit actually tries to explain how Cain come up with a wife in Genesis by asserting that, since we all decended from the same parents, we all marry a relative in some small way. And, at this point in biblical history, God had not made incest a sin so it was perfectly okay to marry your sister or propogate with your daughters (forget not Lot). And there seems to have been a dispensation for Noah and his brood. I believe Caligula made this same argument along with the Marquis de Sade.

Do not take these people lightly. They hold these beliefs as firmly as gravity holds my mass to the surface of this planet. At the very least, hide your daughters. What we all should do, more productively, is watch our town councils and schools boards very closely for signs of creationist encroachment. Do not let an opportunity pass to insist that creationism is religious dogma, not science, not good public policy, and not good education. There is no “other side” to represent, no “controversy” to teach. Inspect textbooks and the stands of political candidates. We have three candidates lusting for presidential office who hold firm to the creationist mythology. Is the closet empty?

I need to end this rant. Below are some useful web resources. I’ve included the web site for the Creation Museum out of fairness. The site is free. Admission to the Museum was $19.95 (it was $9.00 for the Churchill Down’s Museum and the movie was much better!).

Future reading and surfing:

http://www.nytimes.com/pages/science/sciencespecial2/index.html

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/home.php

http://www.creationmuseum.org/

Advertisements

2 Responses to Dangerous Idea, Part 2

  1. suzanne says:

    if the Creation Museum would dare to represent this view in their ‘rave reviews’ on their site. Not. They represented just one dissention on their review page and it was poorly edited (most likely on purpose).

    They definitely have their own marketing (propaganda) machine.

  2. Nicola Evans says:

    Good grief, I’ve never heard of such a thing! Do people go simply out of curiosity that a thing like this actually exists in the 21st century or do people really believe it? I know a lot of committed christians who don’t believe literally in the story of creation, doesn’t make them any less christian IMO.

    I should imagine it was a mind boggling experience – and not in a good way….

    Nicola

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: